You are here: joeclark.org → Captioning and media access → DVD → → Comments on guidelines for audiovisual (talking) DVD/STB menus → WGBH
Skip right ahead to: Major errors → ¶ Minor errors →
Updated 2003.08.28
WGBH Educational Foundation’s oddly-named Access to Convergent Media Project listed its activities as:
Worked with industry partners to develop solutions that allow blind and visually impaired consumers to navigate the graphics-rich environments of the digital set-top boxes and DVDs.
The “deliverables” included a set of written guidelines on making graphical menus for DVDs and set-top boxes (STBs) accessible.
The guidelines were published, considerably late, in August 2003, and they are rather a disappointment.
The guidelines do not give enough information to teach you how to make DVD or STB menus accessible. A developer could not sit down with the guidelines and alter his or her work practices to make a menu system accessible. There isn’t enough information to go on. The guidelines fail to train readers on how to provide audiovisual menus without further assistance.
The guidelines were professionally written, and that’s part of the problem: The document takes on writerly tones when it should be giving solid, well-documented, easy-to-understand information. I can’t understand who the expected audience is. I assume it would not surprise WGBH if developers read the guidelines, but the feel is one of an expert on the topic imparting just a little bit of information at a dinner party.
The tone throughout is one of “This is terribly difficult.” And the guidelines stop there, satisfied with remarking upon the terrible difficulty. But WGBH’s task was not to complain about how hard it is to make menus accessible; I submit its responsibility involved writing a free-standing handbook that would actually teach developers how to do it. And in an unexpected twist, many of the issues the guidelines raise are not very difficult to solve at all, and WGBH’s own DVD productions solved them handily – facts that are never actually explored in WGBH’s own guidelines. In essence, WGBH even fails to toot its own horn.
The WGBH guidelines will not teach you:
The guidelines do not give you:
WGBH should incorporate my comments (and everybody else’s) and release a Version 2.0 of the guidelines.
I’ll link to comments from other developers, writers, critics, and interested parties as they become available online.