| 1 | 24.Aug.05 | Keele & Dundas | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | “Too big, not enough room to walk” | No | [Blank] | Too much advertising already on streets |
| 2 | 24.Aug.05 | Keele & Dundas | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 3 | 24.Aug.05 | Keele & Dundas | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | Why not ads every where already | [Blank] |
| 4 | 24.Aug.05 | Keele & Dundas | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] | Obtrusive | No | Too many ads already | Too big |
| 5 | 24.Aug.05 | Keele & Dundas | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 6 | 24.Aug.05 | Keele & Dundas | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | Should work well |
| 7 | 24.Aug.05 | Keele & Dundas | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | [Blank] | “Nice design, concerned that bins may fill up quickly “ |
| 8 | 24.Aug.05 | Keele & Dundas | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | “Need bins to prevent litter, garbage compartment seems small” |
| 9 | 24.Aug.05 | Dundas & Clendenan | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Convenient | Yes | As long as revenue goes to good use | [Blank] |
| 10 | 24.Aug.05 | Dundas & Clendenan | No | Though it was a bus stop | No | [Blank] | No | Bad idea | Too many ads already |
| 11 | 24.Aug.05 | Dundas & Clendenan | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Convenient | Yes | [Blank] | Good Initiative |
| 12 | 24.Aug.05 | Dundas & Clendenan | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | Bin looks good | [Blank] |
| 13 | 24.Aug.05 | Dundas & Clendenan | Yes | Once you know what it is | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 14 | 24.Aug.05 | Dundas & Clendenan | No | Too big | Yes | Good position | No | “Old bins better, new bins obtrusive.” | [Blank] |
| 15 | 24.Aug.05 | Dundas & Clendenan | Yes | [Blank] | No | Convenient | Yes | lid over garbage | [Blank] |
| 16 | 24.Aug.05 | Dundas & Clendenan | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Convenient | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 17 | 24.Aug.05 | Dundas & Clendenan | No | Too big | Yes | Poor position | No | “Obtrusive, takes up too much space.” | [Blank] |
| 18 | 24.Aug.05 | Dundas & Clendenan | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | Promote the ashtray so smokers are aware. | [Blank] |
| 19 | 24.Aug.05 | Dundas & Clendenan | Yes | Easy to use | Yes | Very large | Yes | Good idea | Need more bins |
| 20 | 24.Aug.05 | Dundas & Clendenan | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | “Good position, nice and clean” | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 21 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & St. Clair | No | Doesn’t look like a garbage can | [Blank] | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 22 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & St. Clair | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | Great Idea |
| 23 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & St. Clair | Yes | Ashtray good idea | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 24 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Too big | Yes | [Blank] | “Garbage needs lid, recyclables keeps bees out.” |
| 25 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | No | Obtrusive | Yes | [Blank] | Too much advertising already |
| 26 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Too close to curb | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 27 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 28 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | Make ashtray more obvious |
| 29 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | “Great Idea, need more” |
| 30 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | Good Idea |
| 31 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good Location | Yes | Revenue or not | [Blank] |
| 32 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Obstructs sidewalk | Yes | [Blank] | Should turn parallel to curb |
| 33 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good Location | Yes | Great Idea | Promote them more |
| 34 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good Location | Yes | If it lowers taxes | Revenue should go to social programs |
| 35 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | Seems ok | No | Good Position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 36 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good Position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 37 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | Please empty regularly |
| 38 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | As long as it does not cost tax payers | [Blank] |
| 39 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | [Blank] | No | “Good position, looks good” | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 40 | 24.Aug.05 | Jane & Bloor | Yes | “Easy to use, and clear” | Yes | Too close to curb especially when cars are parked | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 41 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Greenwood | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good Position | Yes | If it makes the city revenue | [Blank] |
| 42 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Greenwood | Yes | Think they will fill up faster than the other Silverboxes | Yes | Good position | Yes | Good for the City if it makes money | Does not look like a garbage can |
| 43 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Greenwood | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Should be closer to intersection | Yes | as long as ads are tasteful | bins are attractive |
| 44 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Greenwood | Yes | never used one but looks easy | Yes | Good position | Yes | If it makes the city revenue | bins are attractive |
| 45 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Greenwood | Yes | [Blank] | No | Does not take up too much space | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 46 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Greenwood | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Ok | Yes | [Blank] | Good idea |
| 47 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Greenwood | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good Location | Yes | only if money goes to good use | Think the Silverboxes bins are better |
| 48 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Greenwood | No | Concerned about non-English speaking | No | should be placed parallel | Yes | [Blank] | Instructions should be more visible and less complicated |
| 49 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | should be placed parallel | No | Too many ads already | [Blank] |
| 50 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Takes up too much space on the sidewalk | No | Ads are too big | Too many ads already |
| 51 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | No | impractical | Yes | should be placed parallel so both ends can be used | No | [Blank] | small bins are better large bins are intrusive |
| 52 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | Once you know what it is | No | should be parallel takes up too much space | No | [Blank] | Garbage bins need to be bigger. |
| 53 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | [Blank] | No | seems ok but takes up some walking space | Yes | Do not put bins too close together | [Blank] |
| 54 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | No | Too many ads already | [Blank] |
| 55 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | [Blank] | No | ok | Yes | [Blank] | Move six inches back |
| 56 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Move closer to curb | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 57 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | [Blank] | No | Better than horizontal | Yes | [Blank] | looks good |
| 58 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | [Blank] | No | Bin should be parallel | Yes | if the city makes money | small bins are better |
| 59 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good position | Yes | if the city makes money | [Blank] |
| 60 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | No | “Not clear what goes where, difficult for kids and seniors” | No | “Too big, not enough room to walk” | No | Too many ads already | against advertising |
| 61 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | No | “Openings should be larger, too complicated” | No | Would be easier to use if parallel | Yes | [Blank] | in favour of the bins |
| 62 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Too large blocks sidewalk | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 63 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | No | Not well signed | [Blank] | Blocks sidewalk | No | Against advertising | Design is too complicated |
| 64 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | [Blank] | Yes | [Blank] |
| 65 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | “Good position, blocks stores” | Yes | if the city makes money | [Blank] |
| 66 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | No | Not clear on how to use | No | should be parallel takes curb side is a waste | Yes | If used properly | Need more people to clean bins |
| 67 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position does not obstruct sidewalk | Yes | Good idea | Great for the City |
| 68 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Pape | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good position does not obstruct sidewalk | Yes | If used properly | Good idea |
| 69 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | [Blank] | No | Ok | Yes | but prefer no advertising | Make bins smaller |
| 70 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good position | Opinion | “What kind of ads, where does revenue go” | Bin but clean |
| 71 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | “Should be parallel, takes up too much space” | Yes | [Blank] | Too tall |
| 72 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | No | [Blank] | Yes | poor position blocks traffic sightlines | No | would rather pay taxes | “too large, ugly” |
| 73 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | No | Have to read prior to using | Yes | “Blocks sidewalk, obstructs driver view” | Opinion | Silverboxes are better | [Blank] |
| 74 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | No | [Blank] | Takes up too much space on the sidewalk | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 75 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | “Takes up too much space on the sidewalk, too big “ | Yes | [Blank] | Concerned about safety for women as someone can hide behind them |
| 76 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | [Blank] | No | “Too big, not enough room to walk” | Yes | [Blank] | “Bins should be parallel, too large” |
| 77 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | should be parallel takes curb side is a waste | No | “Too big, Too many “ | [Blank] |
| 78 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good Location | Yes | [Blank] | Great idea |
| 79 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | if you know what it is | No | Too big obstructs view | Yes | [Blank] | “Not much of an improvement, batteries compartment is a great idea” |
| 80 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | Relatively easy | No | Blocks pedestrians walking | No | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 81 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | if the city makes money | Silverboxes are better and clearly marked |
| 82 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Ok | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 83 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | Self explanatory | Yes | Too close to curb | Yes | [Blank] | Too much advertising |
| 84 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | No | Not clear | Yes | Too big | No | Not good for the City | [Blank] |
| 85 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | “Not clear, garbage too small” | Yes | Too big takes up to much space | No | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 86 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Playter | Yes | [Blank] | No | Ok | Yes | Great Idea | [Blank] |
| 87 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Gough | Yes | [Blank] | No | Should be parallel | Yes | Need more revenue and less taxes | [Blank] |
| 88 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Gough | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | Program should work well |
| 89 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Gough | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | “Should be parallel, somewhat dangerous” | Yes | If it lowers taxes | Good Idea |
| 90 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Gough | No | [Blank] | No | Takes up too much space | No | “Garbage is too small, should just use wire baskets” | [Blank] |
| 91 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Gough | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Very convenient | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 92 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Gough | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Should be parallel | Opinion | Silverboxes are better | [Blank] |
| 93 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Gough | Yes | [Blank] | No | Ok | No | “Not necessary, use tax payers money” | Cigarettes good idea but bins are too large |
| 94 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Gough | Yes | [Blank] | No | Should be parallel | Yes | [Blank] | “Recycling compartment great, make sure garbage does not overflow” |
| 95 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Gough | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Should be parallel for both ends to be used | Yes | [Blank] | “Good idea, nice looking” |
| 96 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Gough | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good location | Yes | [Blank] | “Ads seem to be more important than garbage, nice to see a new design” |
| 97 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Gough | Yes | [Blank] | No | Should be parallel | No | Against advertising | Doesn’t like new design |
| 98 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Gough | Yes | [Blank] | No | “Should be parallel, takes up too much space” | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 99 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Gough | No | Too complicated | No | “Should be parallel, blocks traffic views safety concern” | No | Too many ads already | Must be better ways to bring in revenue |
| 100 | 30.Aug.05 | Danforth & Gough | Yes | [Blank] | No | Not too bulky | Yes | If it goes to good use | Looks good |
| 101 | 31.Aug.05 | McCowan & Bushby | Yes | [Blank] | No | “Too close to the curb, and the one side will not be used” | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 102 | 31.Aug.05 | McCowan & Bushby | Yes | [Blank] | No | “Good position, does not take up too much room” | Yes | Depending on where the revenue goes | Good idea |
| 103 | 31.Aug.05 | McCowan & Bushby | Yes | Could be more noticeable | Yes | Good Location | Yes | [Blank] | Good program |
| 104 | 31.Aug.05 | McCowan & Bushby | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good position | Yes | “Why not, makes the City money” | [Blank] |
| 105 | 31.Aug.05 | McCowan & Bushby | No | Slots too small | No | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | Need to redesign bin openings |
| 106 | 31.Aug.05 | Markham & Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | “Good Idea, especially the ashtray” |
| 107 | 31.Aug.05 | Markham & Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | “Poor position, too close to the curb, block car views” | yes | [Blank] | Clean looking |
| 108 | 31.Aug.05 | Markham & Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Too close to curb | Yes | advertising is a good Idea | “Design should be simplified, concerned that people don’t know what they are” |
| 109 | 31.Aug.05 | Markham & Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | No | “Too close to the curb, could cause car accidents” | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 110 | 31.Aug.05 | Markham & Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Opinion | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 111 | 31.Aug.05 | Markham & Ellesmere | No | Not clear | No | Blocks pedestrian flow | Yes | to keep taxes down and bring in revenue | [Blank] |
| 112 | 31.Aug.05 | Markham & Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | “Good position, easy to access both ends” | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 113 | 31.Aug.05 | Markham & Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Easier if placed parallel | Yes | Clean and easy to view | Please empty regularly |
| 114 | 31.Aug.05 | Markham & Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good idea | Bins fill up quickly |
| 115 | 31.Aug.05 | Scarborough Golf Club & Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | to keep taxes down and bring in revenue | “overflow quickly, people place household garbage in bins” |
| 116 | 31.Aug.05 | Scarborough Golf Club & Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Move closer to intersection. | Yes | to keep taxes down and bring in revenue | “Makes it easier, improves City” |
| 117 | 31.Aug.05 | Scarborough Golf Club & Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Concerned about vehicle safety | Yes | [Blank] | Solar and Wind are great ideas |
| 118 | 31.Aug.05 | Neilson and Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 119 | 31.Aug.05 | Neilson and Ellesmere | Yes | Silverboxes easier | No | Easier if placed parallel | Yes | If it goes to good use | [Blank] |
| 120 | 31.Aug.05 | Neilson and Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | No | Convenient | Yes | [Blank] | Nice design |
| 121 | 31.Aug.05 | Neilson and Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | No | Where does the money go | In favour of them |
| 122 | 31.Aug.05 | Neilson and Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | No | Not noticeable | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 123 | 31.Aug.05 | Neilson and Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good location near bus shelter | Yes | Very useful | [Blank] |
| 124 | 31.Aug.05 | Neilson and Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | No problem with placement | Opinion | “Garbage should be larger, design is too focused on advertising.” | [Blank] |
| 125 | 31.Aug.05 | Neilson and Ellesmere | no | “Not a quick glance, didn’t know they existed” | No | Good position | Yes | advertising is a good Idea | “Garbage should be larger, keep it clean and it will work” |
| 126 | 31.Aug.05 | Neilson and Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good location near mall | Yes | Good idea | [Blank] |
| 127 | 31.Aug.05 | Neilson and Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good location | Yes | [Blank] | ugly and big |
| 128 | 31.Aug.05 | Neilson and Ellesmere | Yes | better than Silverboxes | Yes | Good Position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 129 | 31.Aug.05 | Neilson and Ellesmere | No | “not clear, garbage needs to be bigger” | [Blank] | Good Position | Yes | [Blank] | Good idea |
| 130 | 31.Aug.05 | Neilson and Ellesmere | Yes | use pictures on bin instead of sticker | No | Good Position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 131 | 31.Aug.05 | Morningside & Ellesmere | No | Compartments too small | No | Should be placed parallel | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 132 | 31.Aug.05 | Morningside & Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Very noticeable should work well | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 133 | 31.Aug.05 | Morningside & Ellesmere | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good Position | No | [Blank] | “Looks nice, cleaner than Silverboxes” |
| 134 | 20.Sep.05 | Hwy 27 & Humber College Blvd. | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | No problem with placement | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 135 | 20.Sep.05 | Hwy 27 & Humber College Blvd. | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Yes | Yes | [Blank] | People seem to through recyclables in garbage |
| 136 | 20.Sep.05 | Hwy 27 & Humber College Blvd. | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | Garbage capacity should be larger |
| 137 | 20.Sep.05 | Hwy 27 & Humber College Blvd. | No | Confusing | Yes | “Good position, needs to be place in busier location” | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 138 | 20.Sep.05 | Hwy 27 & Humber College Blvd. | Yes | [Blank] | No | “Good position, not on sidewalk” | Yes | [Blank] | Nicer looking than regular garbage cans |
| 139 | 20.Sep.05 | Hwy 27 & Humber College Blvd. | No | [Blank] | No | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 140 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Martin Grove | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Concerned it may fall over | Yes | Good idea | [Blank] |
| 141 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Martin Grove | Yes | [Blank] | No | “Good position, good location” | Yes | [Blank] | Hope it gets used |
| 142 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Martin Grove | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | “Should be in the shade, sunshine makes it smell” | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 143 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Martin Grove | Yes | Easy to understand | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 144 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Martin Grove | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 145 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Martin Grove | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Easily accessible | Yes | If it doesn’t cost money why not | [Blank] |
| 146 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Martin Grove | No | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 147 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Martin Grove | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Opinion | [Blank] | Good Idea |
| 148 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Martin Grove | Yes | Don’t try to make it too nice | No | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 149 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Martin Grove | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | “Good idea, keep it clean” |
| 150 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Martin Grove | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Opinion | [Blank] | What profit does the company make |
| 151 | 20.Sep.05 | Kipling & Albion | No | [Blank] | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Why not it’s just garbage | [Blank] |
| 152 | 20.Sep.05 | Kipling & Albion | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Not noticeable | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 153 | 20.Sep.05 | Kipling & Albion | Yes | [Blank] | No | “Good position, next to bus stop” | Yes | Better than Silverboxes | need to educate people |
| 154 | 20.Sep.05 | Kipling & Albion | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Ok | Yes | Saves space and more sanitary | [Blank] |
| 155 | 20.Sep.05 | Kipling & Albion | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good location | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 156 | 20.Sep.05 | Kipling & Albion | No | Have not used it | Yes | Good Position | Yes | Good idea | Nice looking |
| 157 | 20.Sep.05 | Kipling & Albion | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 158 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Islington SEC | No | Have not used it | No | [Blank] | Yes | if the city makes money | Design looks nice |
| 159 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Islington SEC | No | [Blank] | No | No design is good for here | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 160 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Islington SEC | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | “Nice looking, solar is a good idea” |
| 161 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Islington SEC | No | [Blank] | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 162 | 20.Sep.05 | Finch & Islington SEC | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | Looks more safe and cleaner than the Silverboxes | [Blank] |
| 163 | 27.Sep.05 | College & Bathurst | No | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 164 | [Blank] | College & Bathurst | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 165 | [Blank] | College & Bathurst | Yes | Have not used it | No | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 166 | [Blank] | College & Bathurst | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Attractive | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 167 | [Blank] | College & Bathurst | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Should be back further from curb | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 168 | [Blank] | College & Bathurst | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 169 | [Blank] | College & Bathurst | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | Looks good |
| 170 | [Blank] | College & Bathurst | Yes | [Blank] | No | Should be parallel | Yes | [Blank] | “Looks good, use other languages” |
| 171 | [Blank] | College & Bathurst | No | Have not used it | No | Ok | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 172 | [Blank] | College & Bathurst | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good position | Yes | Good idea | [Blank] |
| 173 | [Blank] | Dundas & Ossington | No | [Blank] | No | “Not safe, stalkers can hide behind it” | No | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 174 | [Blank] | Dundas & Ossington | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Ok | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 175 | [Blank] | Dundas & Ossington | No | [Blank] | No | [Blank] | Yes | [Blank] | Looks good |
| 176 | [Blank] | Dundas & Ossington | Yes | [Blank] | No | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 177 | [Blank] | Dundas & Ossington | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | Better than Silverboxes |
| 178 | [Blank] | Dundas & Ossington | Yes | [Blank] | No | “Not bad, blocks pedestrian flow a little” | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 179 | [Blank] | Dundas & Ossington | No | [Blank] | No | Did not know it was a garbage bin | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 180 | [Blank] | Dundas & Ossington | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | not intrusive | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 181 | [Blank] | Dundas & Ossington | No | [Blank] | No | “Should be parallel, better for pedestrian flow” | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 182 | [Blank] | King & Strachan | Yes | Very practical | No | Ok | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 183 | [Blank] | King & Strachan | No | Easy to use | No | Ok | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 184 | [Blank] | King & Strachan | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Should be parallel | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| 185 | [Blank] | King & Strachan | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | [Blank] | Empty bins regularly |
| [Blank] | King & Strachan | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | [Blank] | Ads won’t solve the litter problem |
| [Blank] | Dufferin & Temple | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | No | Where does the money go | [Blank] |
| [Blank] | Dufferin & Temple | Yes | [Blank] | No | Ok but too large | No | More creative ways to advertise other than on garbage cans | Silverboxes are better |
| [Blank] | Dufferin & Temple | No | [Blank] | Yes | Too big | Yes | [Blank] | Garbage cans are needed to keep the City clean |
| [Blank] | Dufferin & Temple | Yes | [Blank] | No | Impedes side walk | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| [Blank] | Dufferin & Temple | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Parked cars block curbside container | Yes | [Blank] | “Silverboxes are better, you know what they are” |
| [Blank] | Dufferin & Temple | Yes | [Blank] | No | Intrusive but will get peoples attention | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| [Blank] | Dufferin & Temple | Yes | [Blank] | No | “Should be parallel, awkward position” | Yes | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| [Blank] | Dufferin & Temple | Yes | [Blank] | No | Looks like a bus stop don’t notice it right of way | Yes | [Blank] | Great idea |
| [Blank] | Queen and Jameson | No | Due to the pictures | Yes | Too small | Yes | [Blank] | Cleaner than the Silverboxes |
| [Blank] | Queen and Jameson | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | Good position | Yes | “Great Idea, especially if the City receives revenue” | [Blank] |
| [Blank] | Queen and Jameson | Yes | [Blank] | No | Visuals need to be fixed | Yes | [Blank] | “Need more bins, this will help change our culture” |
| [Blank] | Queen and Jameson | Yes | [Blank] | Yes | A little big | Yes | [Blank] | Need more bins |
| [Blank] | Queen and Jameson | No | [Blank] | Yes | position makes it easy to recycle | Yes | Good idea | [Blank] |
|
| [Blank] | [Blank] | No 38 | [Blank] | No 80 | [Blank] | No 26 | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| [Blank] | [Blank] | Yes 161 | [Blank] | Yes 114 | [Blank] | Yes 165 | [Blank] | [Blank] |
| [Blank] | [Blank] | [Blank] | [Blank] | [Blank] | [Blank] | No Opinion 7 | [Blank] | [Blank] |