* joeclark I'm the first one on the call?

wendyya - in the future we can ask the agent not to log until we're
read.ready

YvetteI'm glad I'm on first name basis then :-)

jslatinhi joe

YvetteHi Joe

wendyscribe: wendy

ChristopheircChristophe has joined wai-wcag


greggircgregg has joined wai-wcag

David_ircDavid_ has joined wai-wcag

David_test

wendy"enduring and durable 3.1" ? ;)

BeckyircBecky has joined wai-wcag

AndiircAndi has joined wai-wcag

* Yvette is not allowed to see those results

wendyyes - messed up on the settings and am unable to change.i'll send
them to you, david, bengt, christophe, joe. others need it?

* bengt thinks only the 3.2 is blocked

ChristopheI can't se results for 3.2 either (3.1, 2.4 are OK)

wendybenben has been promoted by wendy

wendyq-

wendyack alex

greggq?

wendyack mike

wendyack g

wendyack j

wendyack b

wendyack a

wendyack a

wendyjohn lists examples of extreme changes of context that he is
concerned about.discussion about "user-initiated extreme changes of
context"action: alex and mike rework proposals for 3.2

* RRSAgent records action 1

* Michael has to leave for 1/2 hour

MichaelircMichael has left wai-wcag

wendyack w

wendyack mi

wendyack jo

wendyproposal 1 - 9 don't wantproposal 2 - 8 don't wantproposal 3 - 5
don't want

wendyack j

Yvetteq-

greggack g

wendyack g

wendyack j

wendyq-

wendyack w

Yvetteack y

wendyack y

wendyack j

wendyack a

wendyaction: ben rework proposal for 4.1 based on feedback (either
choose one approach and work into a proposal, or multiple). include
"current wording" in survey.

* RRSAgent records action 2

wendyjohn clarifies: readable means you can figure out words and
sentences. understandable means you can comprehend what you're reading.
(did i get that right?)

jslatinthink so

wendyresolution: adopt proposed wording for Guideline 3.1 Make text
content readable and understandable.discussing: Proposed wording Level 1
SC2: A mechanism for finding the expanded form of acronyms and
abbreviations is available12 preferred proposed, 7 preferred current

wendyexamples: ibm (name), dvd (no longer stands for what it started
out). are these still acronyms?ack m

wendyack a

gregg* no it didnt you just disappeared

gregg* we did hear a shit

* joeclark I didn't say "shit."joeclark to my knowledge. Tourette's,
anyone?

gregg*someone else then - sounded like they spilled their coffee or
something

wendyq-

Yvetteack y

wendyack j

wendy:)ack g

wendyconcern that discussion about acronym/abbreviation are important
b/c they are structures in HTML.  suggestion to not have anything
specific about acronym and abbreviation because it is covered by "use
according to spec."  counter-example of "footnote" which is not an html
structure that *is* available in pdf.ack ben

jslatin<q> is not supported

wendyack j

joeclarkby the way, Window-Eyes 4.5 and later supports q and
blockquote.IBM HPR 3.04 even supports <ruby>.

wendyresolution: needs more workdiscussing Proposed wording Level 3 SC3:
Section headings and link text are understandable when read by
themselves or as a group (for example in a list of links or a table of
contents).

greggack j

greggack john

greggQ joeclark

wendyack jo

wendyconsider getting feedback about moving to level 2

MichaelircMichael has joined wai-wcag

wendyjoe doesn't support adopting proposed wording.  response on survey
was:This remains a terrible and counterfactual idea, where we require X
(coding according to spec and writing in a linearizable order) and
anti-X (allowing any device to pull out content and remix it).

jslatinproposed l3 sc3 is authorial action to support UA function

wendyresolution: (with objection) for Proposed wording Level 3 SC3:
Section headings and link text are understandable when read by
themselves or as a group (for example in a list of links or a table of
contents).  with the following actions:action: john updated proposal for
L3SC3 w/removal of "screen reader" and ask about moving to level 2.
provide rationale for SC.

* RRSAgent records action 3joeclark can someone put the URL for the 1.3
survey up?

joeclarkq?

wendyack joe

wendyack joh

wendyack gr

Yvetteack y

wendyyvette proposes: ensure that the structure and function of the web
content do not depend on the presentation

* joeclark don't need the word "perception"

wendyack john

wendyack gr

wendyack j

wendyack ja

wendydiscussing - Proposed wording Level 1 SC2: Markup or coding is used
to encode document semantics9 preferred proposed wording, 3 preferred
current wording

* joeclark I gotta go soon.

wendys/9/10

wendyaction: joe rework proposal for L1SC2, including a proposed defn of
"document semantics"

* RRSAgent records action 4

greggircgregg has left wai-wcag