wendyack alex

wendyack wendy

wendyhttp://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1017discussion
about how this change came about. concern that it doesn't belong here 
-typing vs picking info is not a way to prevent error. it's about
efficiency.75 purposefully higher than 50-60 so that it wouldn't apply
to u.s. states, etc.Current text: Where text entry is required for which
there is a known set of less than 75 valid choices and they can be
provided without jeopardizing security or purpose, users are allowed to
select from a list of options as well as to type the data
directly.Proposed text: If there are more than 75 choices, selection
lists must not be the only means of providing the input choice. Another
input method, such as a text entry field, text typing to select items
from list, or a search function, must be provided instead of, or in
addition to, the selection list.Rationale for proposal: The current
success criterion was split into 2 per a proposal from December 2004.
Related to issue 1017. Consensus not reached on 10 and 75 as thresholds.
Andi suggests removing this criterion since it appears to be technology
dependent.no resolution.action: gregg will take action to discuss with
andi

* RRSAgent records action 4

wendyaction 4 = gregg talk with andi about guideline 2.5

* RRSAgent records action 4 replaced

wendyresolved: current text is better than proposed text for this
particular success criterion.  for now, keep current wording.action 4 =
gregg talk with andi about guideline 2.5. ask andi if proposed text fits
better under a different SC.

* RRSAgent records action 4 replaced

benResults of Questionnaire - Proposal for Guideline 3.1:
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/meaning0516/results

wendyProposed text: Guideline 3.1 Make text content readable and
understandable.concern about testability of "readable" and
"understandable"

wendyconcern about only  making text accessible? what about
graphics/images?ack john

wendyjs willing to think about, however likely a separate guideline (to
make non-text content accessible)

wendyack alex

wendyack mc

wendyack alex

wendyjohn clarifies difference between "readable" and "understandable"
and that at this time, none of the proposals address "understandable"

wendytime check?action: john update proposals based on feedback from
survey. ask people to make comments before the weekend to have a chance
to incorporate.

* RRSAgent records action 5

wendyRRSAgent, generate minutes

RRSAgentI have made the request to generate
http://www.w3.org/2005/05/19-wai-wcag-minutes.html wendy

* joeclark couldn't make call (still sick and I sound like Marge's
sisters), but I have IRC up. isn't anybody scribing?

Becky_GibsonircBecky_Gibson has left wai-wcag

wendyhttp://www.w3.org/2005/05/19-wai-wcag-minutes.html

benircben has left wai-wcag