Page 8
Executive Summary
ðAs mentioned in the methodology section, we feel that the most credible sample for analysis of public opinion is the street level intercepts. 
ðTaking all things into consideration, the opinions of street level respondents tend to be more balanced when compared to both on-line and telephone respondents.  This further strengthens the argument that this is the most reliable data to be examining.
ðIf the focus is put on the street level responses, we learn that the EUCAN bins are well received.  The majority of street level respondents (81%), those who actually have seen the bins, feel that they are practical and easy to use.
ðThere does appear to be a need to address the two-end collection issue – either via communications initiatives or better instructions on the actual bin.  A sizeable minority of street level respondents (40%) say that they did not know that both ends could be used to deposit rubbish.
ðSome attention will also need to be paid to positioning if this pilot project is rolled out.  Obviously, the bins will need to be positioned in such a way to minimize impact on both motorists and pedestrians.
ðThe majority of street level respondents feel that the benefits of the bins will outweigh any negative impact.  83% support the initiative citing revenue generation as the primary motivator.